All right it's true. Faced with a public restroom having two or more stalls, if the non-handicapped ones need any janitorial attention, I use the handicapped stall.
This from someone whose sister, niece, and sister-in-law teach special education. Someone who worked at the Commission For The Blind for almost seven years and now volunteers at a stable specializing in therapeutic riding for people with disabilities. Someone who wouldn't think of pulling into a handicapped parking space even when it means not finding an available slot. Talk about PC bona fides.
Recently realized that somehow I concluded using these toilets is not as likely to inconvenience someone with a disability like taking a parking space does. Certainly, I've rationalized, I will not be in a stall as long as someone would occupy a parking space. Detect any magical thinking here?
For anyone who has ever really needed a public restroom, I'm guessing no pictures are required. Faced with a choice, I suspect many disabled people would prefer waiting for the dunce to vacate a handicapped parking space vs. waiting for Pat the dunce in the only stall that can accommodate them. What do you think?
OK, I'll probably be booed for this, but here is my thinking. Having a disability doesn't disqualify you from waiting for a restroom stall just like the rest of us. The handicapped stalls are available so that someone with a disability has access to the restroom, but there is nothing in that implied contract that says they will have immediate access. So I don't have any guilt about using the handicapped stall, especially when it makes the inevitably long line in the women's room move faster. Of course, if I saw someone who was disabled waiting in the line, I would let them go ahead of me. It's different than a parking space, because of the length of time involved and because there is almost always another parking space available somewhere in the parking lot.
ReplyDelete